Food Politics

There is a truth that a lot of people don’t talk about when they are talking about Democrats and Republicans–you can’t tell them apart by what they do or where they live. You can’t tell them apart by what they eat, either. I work in a union workplace and our union workforce is just about as evenly split between Democrats and Republicans as the neighborhoods we work in. The union supports Democrats in elections, of course, but the people in it go their own way at the ballot box. We have work in common.

Republicans tend to support businesses in legal matters, they don’t want regulations on pay or vacations because it would cost businesses either business or money. They tend to support businesses also when it comes to food issues. They are the main reason that food companies don’t have to put the percentage of daily allowance that sugar represents in foods on the nutrition label. They are the reason, primarily, that pizza is a perfectly good lunch food for kids, even if they eat that and only that at every lunch meal. They are the primary reason that our food system will not be curbed in it’s excesses, probably, in my lifetime.

The paradox is that people who vote Republican also eat the same foods that the rest of us do. They are fat like us and getting fatter because there is no reason for food companies to not put sugar in every bite of food we eat. It is cheap and tasty and addictive. I am quite sure that if tobacco companies could put nicotine in baby formula they would love to do it–for business reasons, to get the kids hooked on nicotine for life at an early age. They don’t because in a previous generation lots of laws got passed that were good for the people, and not good for business.

Food might just be an area of actual bipartisan cooperation between you and your opposite party neighbors. Maybe food is the area of our lives where we can agree that the market is not going to correct the problems that the profit motive is inserting into our food supply system. Profit is killing bees, killing people, heating up the planet, causing foods grown close to home to be raised and then shipped half way around the planet to satisfy that thirst for profit. Money is a poor indicator of value.

If a consensus could be formed among us as to what the proper role of government is in our food crisis, in our health crisis, in our world crisis of wasted energy, we could actually come together as a society and force the market to price in external costs like damage to bees, or excessive water usage. It might be time for us to get together and decide what those proper roles will be. Groups are forming in other areas of the nation to press OUR concerns, Left and Right, for the state of affairs in food. In this last election a non-profit group in Florida, Food Policy Action was instrumental in unseating an incumbent Republican whose main talking points in the campaign were food-related. Here is an article about the Food Policy Action efforts.

To bolster the case for giving food policy greater attention during political campaigns, Food Policy Action recently commissioned a poll in which it reportedly found that “voters care deeply about policy-related messages on nutrition assistance.” But the group has its work cut out for it when it comes to persuading the national parties: While Republicans appear committed to cutting food stamps, Democrats have by and large stayed away from the issue of hunger altogether. Graham has avoided hitting Southerland over his attempts to cut food stamps, and earlier this year President Obama signed bipartisan legislation that included substantial cuts to food stamps in certain states.

The political reality is that neither party will care about food issues or food policy until it is pretty obvious that we do. Food is an issue that we all should care deeply about. School lunches are an area that we all should care deeply about. Food safety is something that cuts across party lines and we can talk rationally about no matter who we voted for for President. It is different than climate change debates, because the evidence is undeniable, it is effecting us, right now.


About dcarmack

I am an instrument technician at the electric utility servicing the Kansas City Missouri metropolitan area. I am in the IBEW, Local 412. I was trained to be a nuclear power plant operator in the USN and served on submarines. I am a Democrat, even more so than those serving in Congress or the White House.
This entry was posted in Health, Living and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Food Politics

  1. Sarah says:

    Looking at the Rally for Real Food poster, I reflect that the GMO thing is still controversial and makes a lot of people (including my late father, a biochemist, when he was alive) roll their eyes. Same with organic. There are no proven health risks on the GMO side or proven health benefits on the organic side. The one kernel in it that seems important is that some GMO use (not sure which crops) makes it so farmers can spray huge amounts weed killers on the fields because the GMO crop is made to be resistant to it, so the product ends up with possibly more weed killer in and on it than non GMO crops. As there are only a few GMO crops, mostly corn and soy, people who are worried about this can simply avoid eating factory-made packaged foods that contain corn and soy. People who are worried about all pesticides can buy organic.

    On the other hand, we KNOW that artificial ingredients for improving the texture, color, taste, and shelf life of fake food, and the sugar added to make it taste good, make us addicted, fat, and sick. We KNOW that sugar and flour as a major part of our diet cause obesity. I really wish that the real food movement would emphasize that instead, but it seems fixated on GMOs and organic. I wish the anti-GMO, pro-organic people would give sugar and refined carbs at least equal billing.

    Most packaged food is a slurry of some factory-made combination of flour, fat, soybeans, corn and sugar, with salt, and artificial colors, flavors, and texturizers added to make it seem like food. (Notice that two major GMO crops are ingredients in the slurry?) Any actual meat, dairy, fruit and vegetables in it are there just to make it seem food-like. I think manufacturers would leave them totally out if they could. It’s all about dressing up and accessorizing the flour, fat, soy, corn and sugar. Salt producers are major accomplices. Tomato producers (another major GMO) benefit a lot too from the processed foods biz. Just ask Stouffers, Chef Boyardee, and the frozen pizza industry. I bet most of the fats in prepared foods are made from a Canola oil, another GMO. It’s all connected. The GMOs wouldn’t be planted as much if people stopped buying prepared foods. Sorry for the rambling essay!! Thanks for your blog.


  2. Sarah says:

    Ok I just looked up current GMOs and tomatoes are not one. BUT – and this is astounding – over 90% of all corn, soy and canola currently grown in the US are GMO.


Your comments let me know someone is out there. Thanks!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s